Several newspapers have claimed changes to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) will make it easier for unauthorised Traveller developments to get planning permission. This is not correct.
The claims have misinterpreted the policy and the important changes we have made.
The facts
- We have strengthened the rules on intentional unauthorised development. For the first time, the NPPF is clear that where someone has deliberately developed a site without permission, councils should give this substantial weight when deciding retrospective planning applications.
- There is no weakening of environmental protections. Traveller site applications remain subject to the same policies on environmental impacts, flooding, transport and environmental quality as other forms of development.
- We have removed duplication, not protections. The updated framework streamlines policies and ensures Traveller site applications are judged consistently alongside other planning applications.
- Councils remain in control of local decisions. Local planning authorities are responsible for identifying need, allocating sites and deciding planning applications in their areas.
- Councils retain strong enforcement powers. Local authorities can already take enforcement action, including seeking injunctions where a breach of planning control appears likely.
Put simply, the reforms do not make it easier to secure permission for unauthorised development. In fact, they make the planning framework clearer and stronger by giving greater weight to intentional breaches of planning rules.
An MHCLG spokesperson said:
“The government is cracking down on illegal traveller sites and it is completely misleading to suggest otherwise.
“Our new planning rules explicitly tackle any potential environmental damage and transport impacts, and make it harder for people to get retrospective permission for development that were built without approval.”
Recent Comments